Acer Aspire M7810

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Acer Aspire M7810 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer FMP55
Memory	6.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100329
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '20 at 12:16
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 140 65% 104 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 279 37% 276 Pts	64-Core 276 17% 276 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% MSI(1462 3102) CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 22.4 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 20.2 18% 19.9 fps	MRender 25.6 Gravity 22.7 Splatting 17.3 17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900812 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 169 186 187 186 184 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.4% Above average	Read 233 Write 203 Mixed 193 SusWrite 169 45% 199 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 19.9 76% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 156 126% 178 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 91%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 654GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 170 184 185 185 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 156 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 167 97% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2.1 378% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 575GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 66 66 66 68 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 61 Write 55.7 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 65.4 41% 55.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 113% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 63%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 88 89 88 88 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 78.7 Write 83.2 Mixed 60 SusWrite 83.8 56% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 84%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 134GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 21 6.2 4.6 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 16.2 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 15.5 27% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hitachi GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 None CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 10GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.9% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 9 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M7810 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire M7810

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	14x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	5x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	3x

SSD
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	2x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	2x
HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 38%, 703 samples	2x
GU512303EP0202 4x2GBUnknownBench 37%, 604 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $507

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16