Today's hottest deals

Asus P7P55D-E DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '22 at 17:58
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$60
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 95.8
1-Core 79
2-Core 118
63% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 276
37% 275 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.2% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 71
Parallax 62.6
49% 64.5 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 55.8
50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAJ20104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 100 105 102 108 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42% Average
Read 218
Write 203
Mixed 188
SusWrite 101
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 20.3
81% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 79.9
DQ Mixed 24.6
28% 44.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42%
Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 104 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 189
Write 200
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 105
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E DELUXE Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $603
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback