Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '20 at 16:24
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 182
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 329
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 34.3
20% 28.7 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 27.1
26% 31.8 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 311 336 294 300 321 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 411
Write 364
Mixed 226
SusWrite 306
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 16.8
63% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 339
243% 308 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
9GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 45 67 66 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 78.1
Write 74.1
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 62.4
46% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
41% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 85%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 64GB-$48
17GB free, PID 16b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 26 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 23.2
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 25.5
34% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
78% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 16.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $504
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback