Asus H170M-E D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H170M-E D3  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '20 at 05:11
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$120
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 82.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 221
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 458
61% 456 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 46
Reflection 44.3
Parallax 43.9
38% 44.7 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 35.7
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsun 860 QVO 1TB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 32 29 59 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48% Average
Read 426
Write 78.5
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 35.7
33% 152 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 18.2
79% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 42.7
DQ Mixed 64.7
60% 95.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48%
Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 179 181 182 182 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 152
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 181
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1339DS1S00. 0913 99U5403-159.A01LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-E D3 Builds (Compare 412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-E D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback