Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 24 '20 at 08:02
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 189
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 330
40% 310 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 112
Parallax 88.8
86% 102 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 119
Splatting 99.7
85% 104 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 128GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001c01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 694
Write 524
Mixed 474
125% 564 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 47.2
171% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 408
DQ Mixed 301
237% 321 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 197%
Avexir E100 SERIES - 240GB
60GB free
Firmware: O1015A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 82 83 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 449
Write 400
Mixed 131
SusWrite 117
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 31.1
125% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 112
118% 190 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 163 169 167 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 129
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 165
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
336GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 203 197 202 205 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 140
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 200
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 115%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
931GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 164 154 168 179 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 131
Write 153
Mixed 69
SusWrite 163
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 112%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
98GB free
Firmware: AX101U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 59 63 64 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 71.3
Write 86.3
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 62
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.5 6.9 7 6.6 7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 5.2
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 6.7
12% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.3
169% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1600 2OZ Hynix HMT425U6AFR6C-PB 0420 DDR3 1600 2OZ Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback