HP 500-205eo

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-205eo  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory5.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140115
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 13:54
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ARM-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-670K (2013 D.Ri)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 118
49% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 170
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 195
13% 195 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645
Device(1B0A 90CC) 2GB
CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 42.2
9% 34.4 fps
MRender 31.1
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 28
12% 33.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 12%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SDSA6GM-016G-1006 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: U221006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 51 51 50 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 229
Write 49.7
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 50.3
21% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 8
38% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 13.9
12% 17.5 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 28%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 68 92 90 118 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 65.1
Write 97.3
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 98.5
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
53% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 115%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.3 5.5 5.5 5.1 5.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 7.3
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 5.1
12% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2
128% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 17%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
12GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 23 25 24 26 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 27.7
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 22.8
36% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
57% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.1
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 500-205eo Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: HP 500-205eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $365Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback