Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 22 '17 at 14:15
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 654
65% 530 Pts
64-Core 844
52% 844 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.95
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.1% Good
Lighting 87.3
Reflection 85.8
Parallax 78.1
71% 83.7 fps
MRender 82.6
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 69.2
62% 76.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 24TB
20.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 1,017
Write 763
Mixed 807
192% 862 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 0.87
77% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 35.5
DQ Write 23.1
DQ Mixed 2.8
9% 20.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 414
Mixed 415
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 41.9
154% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 78.9
DQ Mixed 113
100% 155 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST4000LM016-1N2170 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0003 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 82.1
Write 81.4
Mixed 60.8
56% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.71
4K Write 6.62
4K Mixed 0.51
251% 2.95 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 66%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
703GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 90.4
Write 181
Mixed 144
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 5.37
4K Mixed 1.01
246% 2.41 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 112%
Zalman External HDD 1.5TB
326GB free
Firmware: MCCI Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.6% Poor
Read 44.6
Write 44.8
Mixed 43.5
33% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.08
4K Write 0.16
4K Mixed 0.08
15% 0.11 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
110% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 42.6
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 21.5
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 110%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX X99 GAMING Builds (Compare 1,350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $696
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback