Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 20:45
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 66.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
78% 146 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 984
87% 738 Pts
64-Core 2,674
166% 2,674 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 206
Parallax 188
127% 183 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 192
Splatting 135
124% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
382GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3434 3487 3483 3512 3512 3512 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
498% Outstanding
Read 4,165
Write 3,462
Mixed 1,900
SusWrite 3,490
729% 3,254 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 74.6
253% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 934
DQ Write 850
DQ Mixed 877
662% 887 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 498%
Great: 363%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,055
Write 1,358
Mixed 891
316% 1435 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 60.7
229% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 382
DQ Mixed 478
417% 640 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$102
426GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 97 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 91.5
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 97.6
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$102
266GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 138 139 140 140 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 146
Write 122
Mixed 76
SusWrite 137
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 99%
USB DISK 2.0 503GB
282GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 210 211 158 203 209 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Read 4
Write 188
Mixed 54
SusWrite 200
179% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
58% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
145% Outstanding
MC Read 57.8
MC Write 60.6
MC Mixed 54.9
165% 57.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 24.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 145%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $875
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback