Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory40.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 16:33
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 80.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 960
86% 726 Pts
64-Core 2,676
166% 2,676 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 209
Parallax 207
162% 205 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 194
Splatting 133
124% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 139%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
382GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3369 3335 3412 3423 3425 3410 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
488% Outstanding
Read 4,038
Write 3,427
Mixed 2,079
SusWrite 3,396
725% 3,235 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 73.9
252% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 954
DQ Write 873
DQ Mixed 893
676% 907 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 488%
Great: 363%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,066
Write 1,118
Mixed 704
283% 1,296 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 61.9
235% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,059
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 474
404% 613 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$110
426GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 91.3
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 98
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$110
266GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 145 147 146 149 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 135
Write 119
Mixed 97.3
SusWrite 145
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 99%
USB DISK 2.0 503GB
282GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.5% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 35.8
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 37.3
48% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
60% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 26.8
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 27
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 81%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $867
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback