Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2276 x 1334 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '17 at 14:25
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 162
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 320
42% 318 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID K1
Nvidia(10DE 1012) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 849 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 3.54
Parallax 3.5
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 3.43
Splatting 6.09
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 28.2
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 16.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback