Today's hottest deals

Asus Maximus IV GENE-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV GENE-Z  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110525
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 04 '20 at 12:42
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 335
41% 316 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
PwrHis(1787 200F) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 15.2
14% 15.6 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 18.1
12% 14.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 186 187 183 217 346 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 444
Write 140
Mixed 245
SusWrite 230
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 29.6
107% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 147
155% 258 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 114%
WD WD5000AZDX-00SC2B0 500GB
288GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 96 96 95 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 41.3
Write 99
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 95.2
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 80%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 123 124 124 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 133
Write 128
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 123
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 85%
WD WD3000BLFS-08YBU0 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: 04.04V06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 124 124 122 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 124
Write 118
Mixed 76
SusWrite 122
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.8% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV GENE-Z Builds (Compare 450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV GENE-Z - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback