PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH X79 (all builds) |
Memory | 22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131015 |
Uptime | 2 Days |
Run Date | May 04 '20 at 21:20 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
77.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 164 164 167 168 MB/s
|
65.3%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
101GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 88 90 90 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HUS724030ALA640 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MF8OAA70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 123 124 125 128 MB/s
|
73.3%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
324GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 70 72 72 72 MB/s
|
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
82.4%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 434x |
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 383x |
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples | 297x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 104x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 104x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 100x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $812 |