Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq-presario VN432AA-ABF CQ5202FR (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Narra6
Memory	4.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090909
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 05 '20 at 11:44
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29 4,513 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	39% Below average	Memory 65.3 1-Core 39.1 2-Core 75.4 39% 59.9 Pts	4-Core 76.8 8-Core 76.8 10% 76.8 Pts	64-Core 77.5 5% 77.5 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 15.6 Parallax 18.9 16% 18 fps	MRender 16.5 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 20.8 16% 19 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB 3,574 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 73 74 78 73 65 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.4% Poor	Read 110 Write 79.6 Mixed 90.8 SusWrite 70.4 20% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 21.4 4K Mixed 16.9 57% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 64.5 DQ Mixed 22.8 24% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 70%
WD WD5000LUCT-63C26Y0 500GB 2,409 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 342GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 73 73 75 76 76 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 75.6 Write 76.7 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 73.1 46% 63.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 62%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 1GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 0GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1 1 1 1 1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 1 1% 0.77 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 10 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 6.8 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM