Today's hottest deals

Asus N56VZ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus N56VZ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N56VZ
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130522
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 11:26
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 170
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 419
44% 354 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 2103) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 2.9
3% 4.93 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 244 171 170 152 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 399
Write 427
Mixed 384
SusWrite 201
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 32.1
114% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 234
179% 239 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 104%
WD WD5000LUCT-63C26Y0 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 115 115 114 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 103
Write 116
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 114
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.8% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N56VZ Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N56VZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $497
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback