Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '20 at 16:45
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 55.7
1-Core 119
2-Core 236
72% 137 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 465
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID RTX8000P-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 1415) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.06
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 19.3
17% 21.3 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.9
21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 445
Write 186
Mixed 341
71% 324 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 15
51% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 123
92% 123 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 56.8
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 77.8
169% 59.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 32.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 147%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback