Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory768GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 768GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory754.7 GB free of 768 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 00:25
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6258R
CPU1, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 890
79% 667 Pts
64-Core 3,534
219% 3,534 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 512GB-$500
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 295 317 315 323 316 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 473
Write 308
Mixed 266
SusWrite 311
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 26.1
95% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 132
110% 164 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 85%
Intel SSDPE2KE076T8 7.5TB
7TB free
Firmware: VDV10152
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2165 2253 2046 2060 2025 2040 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 810
Write 2,102
Mixed 1,084
SusWrite 2,098
348% 1,524 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 38.5
194% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,291
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 1,025
776% 1,054 MB/s
Poor: 252%
This bench: 265%
Great: 321%
Intel SSDPE2KE076T8 7.5TB
7TB free
Firmware: VDV10152
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2066 2070 2038 2053 2053 2056 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 811
Write 2,099
Mixed 1,106
SusWrite 2056
347% 1,518 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 41.3
252% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,266
DQ Write 894
DQ Mixed 1,045
790% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 252%
This bench: 279%
Great: 321%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12x31.9GB
12 of 12 slots used
383GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
170% Outstanding
MC Read 67.7
MC Write 80.8
MC Mixed 68.5
207% 72.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 170%
Great: 170%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $377WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback