Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac19,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac19,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-AA95B1DDAB278B95
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '20 at 10:34
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 300
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 998
96% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,252
78% 1,252 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Apple(106B 0195) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 51.9
Parallax 74.6
48% 61.9 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 45.6
43% 54 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0512L 500GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXS7LA0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1671 1533 1558 1505 1471 1485 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,741
Write 1,419
Mixed 986
SusWrite 1,537
319% 1,421 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 39.2
124% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,248
DQ Write 513
DQ Mixed 656
545% 806 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 241%
Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 16.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac19,1 Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Apple iMac19,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback