Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 9010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9010  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '20 at 12:56
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 66
1-Core 101
2-Core 207
68% 125 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 443
49% 385 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Zotac(19DA 1556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.3% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 54.3
Parallax 51.8
47% 54.5 fps
MRender 44.7
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 49.1
39% 48 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 292
Write 206
Mixed 150
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 16.3
61% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 66.9
DQ Mixed 85.9
86% 144 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 73%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 8105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 32
Write 24.5
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 14
18% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 67%
Lacie P9220 1TB
240GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 25.5
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 14.1
17% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 61%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
4GB free, PID 1052
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 40 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 15.3
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 39.1
38% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVT8FP-HYC 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 KVT8FP-HYC 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.9% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 4,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback