PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 12.3 GB free of 18.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130715 |
Uptime | 5.3 Days |
Run Date | May 29 '20 at 21:06 |
Run Duration | 194 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5560
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
68.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSD 480GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 99 17 91 20 3.3 MB/s
|
47.4%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
570GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 62 66 66 66 66 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
USB3.0 500GB
99GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7 MB/s
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
|||
USB3.0 3TB
314GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.6 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7 MB/s
|
11.3%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD155UI 1.5TB
149GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
221GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2 1.9 MB/s
|
9.11%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 569x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 535x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 488x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 273x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 156x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 137x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 136x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 73x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 66x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |