Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 15:36
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2675QM
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 58.3
2-Core 111
53% 83.4 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 206
24% 188 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B3) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.36 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.65
3% 3.01 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 417 419 404 397 395 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 446
Write 432
Mixed 359
SusWrite 405
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 33
101% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 308
233% 313 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 134%
Sandisk iSSD P4 8GB
8GB free
Firmware: SSD 9.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 27 26 27 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 127
Write 26.3
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 26
11% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 6.6
24% 7.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 256GB
70GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 18.1
Write 16.5
Mixed 17.1
SusWrite 17.5
24% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 3.8
266% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 0B13 S939A2SGS-ITR 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 9.4
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback