Today's hottest deals

Asus Maximus Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Maximus Extreme  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080723
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 17:04
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$50
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 70.5
42% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 138
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
XFX(1682 3127) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 27.2
Reflection 21.7
Parallax 24.7
22% 24.6 fps
MRender 9.62
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 16.7
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 38 19 21 25 19 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.8% Very poor
Read 45.6
Write 52.3
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 22.8
10% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 15.5
23% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 78%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 116 103 105 110 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 74.3
Write 93.7
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 108
52% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 107%
Intenso Slim Line 32GB
29GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 12 12 12 12 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 26.6
Mixed 26
SusWrite 13.6
32% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.6
100% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 44%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
760GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 21 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 26.4
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 21.7
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 6.1
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus Extreme Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Maximus Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback