Today's hottest deals

Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 14:33
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$80
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 205
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 394
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$234
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Lighting 93.4
Reflection 84.6
Parallax 87.8
76% 88.6 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 79.1
Splatting 74.1
73% 91.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 290 351 353 353 357 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 339
Write 377
Mixed 286
SusWrite 316
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 33
110% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 43.7
42% 62.3 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 111%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.8 4.7 11 8.6 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
9.1% Terrible
Read 30.3
Write 18.5
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 8.6
22% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
69% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.1%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.5% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $906
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback