HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160513
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '17 at 18:23
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 196
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 371
50% 370 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 339A) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 1.73
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.34
1% 1.62 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.39
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST6000AS0002-1N917X 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: AR17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 67.3
Write 159
Mixed 108
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.38
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 0.67
10% 4.82 MB/s
DQ Read 4.78
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 1.29
3% 5.85 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 19%
ST6000AS0002-1N917X 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: AR17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 64.6
Write 115
Mixed 79.9
20% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.64
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 0.81
10% 4.8 MB/s
DQ Read 5.2
DQ Write 9.93
DQ Mixed 1.32
3% 5.49 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 19%
ST6000AS0002-1N917X 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: AR17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 56.8
Write 160
Mixed 85.6
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.47
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 0.81
10% 5.26 MB/s
DQ Read 4.34
DQ Write 9.47
DQ Mixed 1.81
3% 5.21 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 19%
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AHC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 46.4
Write 47.4
Mixed 47.3
36% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.25
60% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 35%
ST6000AS 0002-1N917X 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.2% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 191
Mixed 105
191% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.17
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 0.79
392% 4.19 MB/s
DQ Read 1.61
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 0.8
535% 5.72 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 96%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68TGBN1 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.3% Good
Read 176
Write 155
Mixed 128
191% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.82
4K Mixed 0.25
108% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 68%
WDC WD60 EZRX-00MVLB1 6TB
38GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 157
Write 154
Mixed 91.8
166% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.27
90% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 17.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback