Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '20 at 06:51
Run Duration406 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 122
56% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 353
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 37.8
34% 36.6 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 36
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 290 292 294 284 293 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 452
Mixed 445
SusWrite 268
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 55.9
185% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 58.6
DQ Mixed 79
62% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 122%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
563GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 179 166 162 173 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 164
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 156
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
84% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
128GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 75 75 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 46.3
Write 48.5
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 72.2
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.2% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback