Today's hottest deals

HP t520 Flexible Series TC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP t520 Flexible Series TC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 21EF
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150430
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '17 at 11:13
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-212JC SOC R2E Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Memory 31.2
1-Core 18.9
2-Core 42.1
19% 30.7 Pts
4-Core 37.9
8-Core 39.9
5% 38.9 Pts
64-Core 40.3
2% 40.3 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2E Graphics
HP(103C 21EF) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 1.44
1% 1.75 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.74
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS64GMTS600 64GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 395
Write 77.1
Mixed 129
43% 201 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 15.1
61% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 38
DQ Mixed 11.3
13% 22.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 247
16% 247 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t520 Flexible Series TC Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP t520 Flexible Series TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback