Today's hottest deals

HP t520 Flexible Series TC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP t520 Flexible Series TC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 21EF
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 17:02
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-212JC SOC R2E Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Memory 36.3
1-Core 12.6
2-Core 28.3
18% 25.7 Pts
4-Core 27.7
8-Core 15.1
3% 21.4 Pts
64-Core 11.4
1% 11.4 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2E Graphics
HP(103C 21EF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.5
0% 1.33 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2.1
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS64GMTS400S 64GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1018BDN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 100 159 183 106 172 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.4% Below average
Read 246
Write 218
Mixed 185
SusWrite 140
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 12.7
46% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 50.5
DQ Mixed 31
26% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.39% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 3.9
8% 2.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 4
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 9.39%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t520 Flexible Series TC Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP t520 Flexible Series TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback