Performance Results


Gaming 112% UFO	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 113% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '20 at 16:58
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Memory 84.7 1-Core 150 2-Core 300 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 600 8-Core 1,041 99% 821 Pts	64-Core 1,542 95% 1,542 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 160 Parallax 130 119% 146 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 170 Splatting 118 110% 136 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1573 1569 1981 1892 1773 1668 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	269% Outstanding	Read 851 Write 1,910 Mixed 918 SusWrite 1,743 309% 1,355 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 72.2 234% 86.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,356 DQ Write 1,128 DQ Mixed 1,231 925% 1,238 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 269% Great: 393%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB 7,087 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 963GB free Firmware: 04.01G01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 46 47 48 50 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 53.1 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 48.3 31% 41.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 63%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 926 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 530GB free, PID 0475 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 39.2 Write 26.1 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 42.1 49% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.9% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 21.8 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 29.4 SC Mixed 22.9 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	862x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	569x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	492x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	283x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	255x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,294

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16