HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 213B
Memory7.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '20 at 07:44
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Memory 17.8
1-Core 23.2
2-Core 46.6
16% 29.2 Pts
4-Core 91.6
8-Core 90.8
12% 91.2 Pts
64-Core 91.4
6% 91.4 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
HP(103C 213B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 1.47
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 1.5
1% 2.04 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 2.52
2% 2.01 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.36%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1234GSX 120GB-$55
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AH001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 30 28 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 18.6
Write 35.4
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 28.2
19% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB
9GB free, PID 5408
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4 7.6 7.8 7.8 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
4.46% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 1.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 6.7
8% 7.45 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.46%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.9% Terrible
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 3
9% 3 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 337
12% 337 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback