Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 09:06
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 37
2-Core 71.2
42% 62.1 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 144
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E194) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 9.04
Parallax 7.16
8% 8.53 fps
MRender 8.86
Gravity 6.37
Splatting 9.7
7% 8.31 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 154 181 163 206 191 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.4% Below average
Read 170
Write 97.8
Mixed 116
SusWrite 174
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 8.4
29% 9.87 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 37.8
DQ Mixed 70.7
57% 83.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP500GM30001 500GB
160GB free
Firmware: STOSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 338 364 344 376 333 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 736
Write 345
Mixed 419
SusWrite 354
103% 463 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 19.7
52% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 89.1
DQ Write 19.3
DQ Mixed 28.7
28% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 355%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
73GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 83 95 85 92 90 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.8% Poor
Read 253
Write 140
Mixed 112
SusWrite 89.9
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 3.9
17% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 78%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
675GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 70.7
Write 117
Mixed 46
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback