Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 09:42
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 224
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 456
60% 453 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 55.6
Parallax 51.8
46% 54.8 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 50
Splatting 49.9
45% 56 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S5 512GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 1057 1135 1163 1173 1164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1954
Write 1,139
Mixed 920
SusWrite 1,020
280% 1,258 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 52
188% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 404
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 613
463% 605 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 225%
Great: 289%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GIS F4-3000C16-8GISB 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 34.9
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 28.5
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback