Biostar TA970 Plus

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar TA970 Plus  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 05 '17 at 23:10
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 145
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 447
45% 367 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 68
Parallax 65.9
51% 65.6 fps
MRender 73.8
Gravity 61.1
Splatting 54.5
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Zotac ZT SSD-A5P-240G 240GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 517
Write 453
Mixed 474
107% 481 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 14.7
95% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 62.7
73% 127 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83%
Great: 83%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 153
Mixed 150
117% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 3.26
4K Mixed 0.24
118% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91%
Great: 112%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
12GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Read 25.8
Write 8.15
Mixed 9.92
15% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.49
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.009
21% 1.84 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TA970 Plus Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA970 Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback