Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 14s-fq1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 14s-fq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887C
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 13:54
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 44.9
1-Core 83
2-Core 156
51% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 655
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 887C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.50.02
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
8.7% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 20.9
6% 15.4 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 18.7
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.7%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SBP3512K-AH 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 429 277 484 365 351 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 842
Write 762
Mixed 588
SusWrite 385
144% 644 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 18.6
116% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 548
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 464
330% 427 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 109%
Great: 207%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
7.78% Terrible
Read 23.5
Write 8.3
Mixed 12
SusWrite 14.1
18% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.78%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 25.8
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14s-fq1xxx Builds (Compare 444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14s-fq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback