MSI B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A64
MotherboardMSI B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime10.3 Days
Run DateJul 04 '20 at 00:37
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 85%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$184
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 133
56% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 274
38% 280 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.9% Very good
Lighting 93.5
Reflection 98.5
Parallax 82.1
76% 91.4 fps
MRender 74.4
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 88.3
69% 84 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 88%
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
MSI(1462 7A64) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
7.03% Terrible
Lighting 7.47
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 7.44
6% 8.38 fps
MRender 9.52
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 14.8
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 193 212 205 205 204 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 359
Write 281
Mixed 208
SusWrite 203
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 24.3
88% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 210
183% 274 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 101%
Corsair CMFSSD-128GBG1 128GB
110GB free
Firmware: VAM0501Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 38 65 69 68 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 81.5
Write 14.2
Mixed 37
SusWrite 54.9
10% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 5.4
21% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 21%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63
691GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 73 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 77
Write 77.2
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 74.5
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 57%
Corsair Voyager SliderX1 30GB
23GB free, PID 1a15
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 29 10 24 31 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 34
Write 6.7
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 21.6
30% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
50% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 17.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64) Builds (Compare 400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B250 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $504
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback