Today's hottest deals

Mm-vision Computer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMm-vision Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '20 at 10:56
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 266
96% 171 Pts
4-Core 615
8-Core 1,189
107% 902 Pts
64-Core 1,682
104% 1,682 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Asus(1043 868B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 120
Parallax 114
102% 120 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 106
Splatting 86
88% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,580
Write 2,144
Mixed 1,483
458% 2,069 MB/s
4K Read 64.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 86.3
282% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,499
DQ Write 973
DQ Mixed 1,183
896% 1,218 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 122 122 123 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 108
Write 102
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 123
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion+ 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 127 127 129 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 84.2
Write 113
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 124
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
154% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 68%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB
845GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 94 94 94 94 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 87.2
Write 66.3
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 92.7
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 66%
SANDISK SDDR-489 32GB
30GB free, PID cfc9
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 31 32 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 27.5
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 31.6
40% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.8
186% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 37%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 500GB
145GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 34.2
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 38.8
46% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMWX16GC3000C16W4D 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.4% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 23
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 24.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Computer Builds (Compare 1,792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Mm-vision Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 136% - Outstanding Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback