Today's hottest deals

Asus M11BB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus M11BB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M11BB
Memory14.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 02:18
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU
FM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 74
52% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 73.6
8-Core 73.3
10% 73.4 Pts
64-Core 71.2
4% 71.2 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.7% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 84.1
48% 69.8 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 60.5
Splatting 55.2
49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SS D S396 30GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.2.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 25 37 38 37 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.7% Average
Read 213
Write 39.6
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 35.9
19% 89 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 28.6
104% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 53.9
DQ Write 39.6
DQ Mixed 44.7
34% 46.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 45%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
580GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 104 166 173 165 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 135
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 157
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.5
202% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
258GB free
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 72 114 116 112 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 127
Write 115
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 109
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
569GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 65 103 103 99 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 98.1
73% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273CH0-YH9 M391B5273CH0-YH9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.8% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 7
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M11BB Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M11BB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback