Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150429
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 12 '20 at 00:49
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 87.6
1-Core 60
2-Core 82.2
52% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 80.9
8-Core 79.4
11% 80.2 Pts
64-Core 79
5% 79 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36BD) 2GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 39.5
30% 38.6 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 35.7
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T25 3X2512G 512GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S050
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 240 120 38 64 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 420
Write 357
Mixed 342
SusWrite 110
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 0.9
49% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 12.3
DQ Mixed 24
34% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
624GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 118 120 120 130 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 168
Write 132
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 123
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.6
311% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.2
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback