Huananzhi X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics85.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '20 at 18:34
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 128
56% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 487
44% 367 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 118
Parallax 99.9
87% 108 fps
MRender 98
Gravity 104
Splatting 104
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KC-S44240-6F 240GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 413 418 436 439 440 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 431
Mixed 416
SusWrite 419
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 28.4
117% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 48.6
100% 200 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
304GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 77 78 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 93.5
Write 92.1
Mixed 61
SusWrite 78.6
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
249GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 87 77 86 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 91.9
Write 95.7
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 84.3
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0- 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 31.7
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback