Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180820
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 16 '20 at 21:39
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 134
54% 91 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 316
37% 284 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 8589) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.26% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 7.16
5% 6.66 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.09
3% 3.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.26%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 161 16 19 27 16 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.3% Poor
Read 134
Write 93
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 70.3
21% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 8.3
32% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.2
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 14.9
12% 16 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.9
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback