Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190326
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '20 at 22:10
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 688
64% 534 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Dell(1028 0680) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 19.2
18% 19 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 16
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NT-512 512GB
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 227 235 233 224 234 MB/s
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
74.1% Very good
Read 246
Write 239
Mixed 236
SusWrite 230
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 38.2
136% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 180
136% 181 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 110%
Netac SS D 720GB
99GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 173 16 13 126 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 388
Write 178
Mixed 294
SusWrite 91
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 7.4
35% 9.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 23.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 24.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback