Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '17 at 09:55
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 209
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 814
73% 614 Pts
64-Core 1161
72% 1161 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.8% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 110
Parallax 106
83% 106 fps
MRender 98
Gravity 95.6
Splatting 99.2
80% 97.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 2 950GB
702GB free
Firmware: 8.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
144% Outstanding
Read 1,209
Write 953
Mixed 938
230% 1,033 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 23.8
100% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 76.7
84% 140 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 144%
Great: 272%
Amd-raid Crucial_CT256MX1 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 491
Write 325
Mixed 383
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 14.5
81% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 47.9
DQ Mixed 14.5
17% 28.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2800 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.7% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 24.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 22.2
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback