Toshiba Satellite C855

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite C855  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 01:56
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B980
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 50.8
2-Core 82.3
44% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 79.8
8-Core 79.7
11% 79.8 Pts
64-Core 64.1
4% 64.1 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB20) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.81
1% 1.01 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xstar 480GB 480GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 257 256 250 249 249 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 300
Write 293
Mixed 252
SusWrite 256
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 31.4
106% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 100
101% 164 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TSB1600D3S1ELD/4GE TSB1600D3S1ELD/2GE 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 12.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.4
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C855 Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C855

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback