Toshiba Satellite S855

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite S855  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '17 at 01:46
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 84.8
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 132
62% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 170
26% 185 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB20) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 2.75
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.61
4% 5.01 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JEDOA60B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 64.1
Mixed 62.4
49% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.15
47% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TSB1600D3S1ELD/4GE TSB1600D3S1ELD/2GE 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite S855 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite S855

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $458
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback