Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '20 at 05:48
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 114
54% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 278
30% 238 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Lighting 70.7
Reflection 68.1
Parallax 94.7
58% 77.8 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 57.4
53% 66.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 132 128 128 127 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 489
Write 405
Mixed 338
SusWrite 157
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 28.7
106% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 45.9
DQ Mixed 98.8
84% 129 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 110%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
53GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 291 310 307 313 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 487
Write 403
Mixed 380
SusWrite 305
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 32.3
113% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 44.3
DQ Mixed 79.6
79% 133 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
534GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 193 206 205 204 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 168
Mixed 86.6
SusWrite 199
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 116%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600EL Series F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 1600EL Series F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback