Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 04:48
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 77.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 263
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 1,142
92% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,146
71% 1,146 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Nvidia(10DE 12FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 105
Parallax 97.9
86% 103 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 84.8
Splatting 64.3
71% 90.7 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 11 11 11 11 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 349
Write 55.9
Mixed 64
SusWrite 11.2
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
19% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 77%
Qemu HARDDISK 537GB
369GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 10 10 10 10 5.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 198
Write 40.4
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 10.3
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.7
415% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 38.8
98% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 36.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback