Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory11.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory7.3 GB free of 11.7188 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 23:21
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 76.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 269
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 524
71% 527 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 6000
Nvidia(10DE 12BA) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 205
Parallax 222
172% 213 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 212
Splatting 169
170% 214 fps
Poor: 136%
This bench: 157%
Great: 173%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 86GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 559
Write 514
Mixed 543
120% 539 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 20.8
75% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 116
90% 122 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 60%
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB
41GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 146 148 125 95 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 511
Write 359
Mixed 406
SusWrite 127
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 27.6
98% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 410
DQ Write 421
DQ Mixed 412
311% 415 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x11GB
1 of 1 slots used
11GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 26.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback