Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision 5820 Tower

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision 5820 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06JWJY
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200706
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 06 '20 at 04:51
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2265
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 77.6
1-Core 146
2-Core 289
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 1085
96% 815 Pts
64-Core 1,982
123% 1,982 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
Nvidia(10DE 139E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 155
Parallax 157
134% 158 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 137
Splatting 109
115% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC601 SK hy 1TB
801GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1595 1278 1292 1300 1301 1289 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,496
Write 1,864
Mixed 725
SusWrite 1,342
306% 1,357 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 48.2
210% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,112
DQ Write 929
DQ Mixed 894
704% 978 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 250%
Great: 250%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
462GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 495 488 494 479 425 364 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 471
Mixed 424
SusWrite 458
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 55.4
186% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
SDHC Card 32GB
28GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 82.1
Write 29
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 30.9
53% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 4.5
291% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 33%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
14GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.6
Write 49.8
Mixed 43.3
69% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
96% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7JJR8N-WM 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 59.8
MC Mixed 41.1
138% 48.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 11.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 119%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 5820 Tower Builds (Compare 2,748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

System: Dell Precision 5820 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback