ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot Drive	82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150128
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '15 at 20:31
Run Duration	329 Seconds
Run User	ARE-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$211 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 102 2-Core 199 68% 150 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 783 68% 583 Pts	64-Core 1172 72% 1172 Pts
Poor: 70% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Asus(1043 8539) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5362 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 68% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Ignite 960GB-$462 185 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 894GB free Firmware: SAFM01.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 272 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 96 (11) Unknown 100 100 109 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 2226 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 58 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850919454 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 67 (F1) Unknown 100 100 33	83.2% Excellent	Read 493 Write 497 Mixed 497 111% 496 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 55.6 4K Mixed 12.3 76% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 12.6 76% 172 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 109%
Corsair Force LS SSD 960GB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 215GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFC01.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 275 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 101 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1845 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 131089 (AE) Unknown 100 100 67 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 67 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850919454 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1976 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1251	82.9% Excellent	Read 498 Write 480 Mixed 474 108% 484 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 52.9 4K Mixed 10.5 74% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 7.7 82% 191 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 105%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$212 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 5.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 203 195 8825 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 151 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 227 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 89 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 53 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 594 (C2) HDA temperature 124 114 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	96.1% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 160 Mixed 145 120% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.86 4K Mixed 0.29 122% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 98%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$212 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 5.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 201 199 8941 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 359 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 162 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 98 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 59 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1054 (C2) HDA temperature 122 115 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	89.1% Excellent	Read 151 Write 160 Mixed 151 116% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.69 4K Mixed 0.31 122% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 98%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$212 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 205 188 8716 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 708 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1318 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 176 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 65 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7333 (C2) HDA temperature 120 111 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 438 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	88.5% Excellent	Read 170 Write 138 Mixed 138 112% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.19 87% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$48 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 213GB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 170174968 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 829 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 47274866216 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22279 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 677 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 70 57 572325918 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 540 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 74 74 52248 (C2) HDA temperature 30 43 77309411358 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 69063074138453 (F1) Unknown 100 253 16684305901684 (F2) Unknown 100 253 -56648311386283	64.5% Good	Read 106 Write 118 Mixed 122 88% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.25 72% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 114%
WDC WD10 EADS-00P8B0 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 819GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.5% Poor	Read 78.2 Write 66.7 Mixed 62.9 87% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.19 47% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 29%
Toshiba External USB HDD 1TB 574 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 392GB free, PID a004 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 36.5 Mixed 35.6 46% 35.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.18 62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 19%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 338GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 81.8 Write 96.1 Mixed 81.4 113% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.33 55% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

CPU
Core i7-5930KIntel $143Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	566x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	543x
Core i7-5960XIntel $211Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	472x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	219x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	199x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $90Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $799

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback