Asrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '20 at 10:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 296
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 824
87% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 96.1
Parallax 94.6
86% 98.9 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 92
Splatting 82.4
76% 93.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 2 480GB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 57 61 50 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 408
Write 39.9
Mixed 164
SusWrite 61.5
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 14
42% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 40.8
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 20.5
30% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 71%
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB
460GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 67 65 64 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 146
Write 30.6
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 69.5
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$32
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.8
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 35.5
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $809
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback