ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3 (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140716
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '15 at 17:12
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 110 2-Core 217 74% 163 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 420 55% 412 Pts	64-Core 421 26% 421 Pts
Poor: 51% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5362 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.5% Above average	Lighting 63 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 58.2 51% 62.6 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 58.1 Splatting 52.7 49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_CT240M500SSD1 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 303GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 45 43 16886 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1260 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9468 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1063 (B5) Unknown 98 98 46539927 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 52 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 48 223339020319 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 970 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1427	9.74% Terrible	Read 76 Write 97.8 Mixed 88.7 20% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 2.49 4K Mixed 0.4 2% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.74% Great: 16%
Samsung HD204UI 240GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3599 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1027 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 39 (AE) Unknown 100 100 67 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4066 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 60 171798691867 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 7792296974 (F7) Unknown 100 100 247620815 (F8) Unknown 100 100 373201918	70.7% Very good	Read 479 Write 265 Mixed 350 81% 365 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 12.6 102% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 48.5 65% 109 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 78%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 634GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 169 4200 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5098 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6258 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1575 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 62 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5035 (C2) HDA temperature 113 105 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	72% Very good	Read 131 Write 120 Mixed 103 88% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.19 76% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-H87-HD3 Builds (Compare 859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	173x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	139x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	88x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	72x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	64x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	48x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	32x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples	21x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $142

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback