MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '20 at 19:50
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 109
2-Core 217
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 459
61% 459 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta R800 120GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RS7DV0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 361 361 362 355 281 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 406
Write 356
Mixed 268
SusWrite 347
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 16.2
101% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 79.7
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 18.2
66% 137 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 76%
MXT-USB Storage Device 16GB
11GB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
9.77% Terrible
Read 19.1
Write 18.6
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 17.9
25% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.3
83% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.77%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD2400U1704JY 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.5
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback